The Influence of Site Visuals, Website Quality, and Perceived Product Benefits on Gen Z’s Purchase Decisions on TikTok

Authors

  • Andriya Riana Justitia Magister Manajemen, Fakultas ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia. Author
  • Sutono Magister Manajemen, Fakultas ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia. Author
  • Ag. Sunarno Handoyo Magister Manajemen, Fakultas ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53905/Gimer.v1i04.28

Keywords:

site visuals, site quality, product benefits, shopping experience, purchasing decision

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The rapid evolution of social media platforms has transformed digital commerce, with TikTok emerging as a prominent social commerce platform. TikTok's integration of entertainment and shopping features has attracted significant attention from businesses, particularly in reaching Generation Z consumers who represent the platform's largest user demographic. This research investigates the role of site visuals, site quality, and product benefits in shaping Gen Z purchasing decisions on TikTok, with shopping experience as a mediating variable. The study specifically examines Le Skin Aesthetic Wonosobo consumers' behavior on the TikTok platform.

Materials and methods: A quantitative approach using survey methodology was employed to collect data from 140 Gen Z consumers (aged 15-28 years) who made purchases through TikTok Shop during March-May 2025. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 24.0 software. The research model examined five constructs: Site Visuals (X1), Site Quality (X2), Product Benefits (X3), Shopping Experience (Y1), and Purchase Decision (Y2), measured using validated multi-item scales.

Results: Site Visuals (β=0.312, p<0.01) and Site Quality (β=0.384, p<0.001) demonstrated significant positive effects on Shopping Experience, collectively explaining 51.4% of its variance. Product Benefits exhibited the strongest direct effect on Purchase Decision (β=0.421, p<0.001). However, Site Visuals, Site Quality, and Shopping Experience showed no significant direct effects on Purchase Decision. Shopping Experience failed to mediate the relationships between exogenous variables and Purchase Decision. The overall model demonstrated excellent fit indices and explained 61.6% of variance in Purchase Decision.

Conclusions: Gen Z consumers' purchase decisions on TikTok are primarily driven by tangible product benefits rather than site aesthetics or experiential factors. While site characteristics successfully shape the shopping experience, they do not translate into actual purchase behavior, revealing a notable disconnect between engagement and conversion in the social commerce context for skincare products.

References

Abigail, J., Sari, V. P., & Saputra, D. (2024). The Influence of Product Quality and Online Shopping Experience (OSE) on Consumer Loyalty Through Customer Satisfaction on Local Skincare Products. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.037

Asanprakit, S., & Kraiwanit, T. (2023). Causal factors influencing the use of social commerce platforms. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 9(4), 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100172

Azer, J., Blasco‐Arcas, L., & Alexander, M. (2023). Visual Modality of Engagement: Conceptualization, Typology of Forms, and Outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 27(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231190867

Bleier, A., Harmeling, C. M., & Palmatier, R. W. (2018). Creating Effective Online Customer Experiences. Journal of Marketing, 83(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918809930

Bray, G. A. (2024). TikTok Live Shopping and E-Commerce Integration: Seamless Shopping Experiences. Law and Economy, 3(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.56397/le.2024.02.01

Chen, P., & Kim, Y. G. (2014). Application of the Stimuli-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Framework to Online Shopping Behavior. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13, 159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.944437

Darley, W. K., Blankson, C., & Luethge, D. J. (2010). Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review [Review of Toward an integrated framework for online consumer behavior and decision making process: A review]. Psychology and Marketing, 27(2), 94. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20322

Eklund, A., Edenbrandt, A. K., Rahm, J., & Johansson, M. (2024). The physical environment matters: room effects on online purchase decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1354419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354419

Erasmus, A., Boshoff, E., & Rousseau, G. (2010). Consumer decision-making models within the discipline of consumer science: a critical approach. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences / Tydskrif Vir Gesinsekologie En Verbruikerswetenskappe, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/jfecs.v29i1.52799

Hermawan, I. (2024). How tiktok shop drives beauty product purchase intentions among moeslem gen Z women in Medan. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economics Research, 6(2), 132. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijier.v6i2.2495

Hong, P. T. T., & Anh, T. N. H. (2023). E-Trust in Social Commerce: A Comprehensive Review. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 99. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-348-1_10

Hu, T.-L., Chao, C., Hsieh, W.-K., & Lin, C.-H. (2025). The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan. Sustainability, 17(7), 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073195

Jakubowska, D., Dąbrowska, A., Pachołek, B., & Sady, S. (2024). Behavioral Intention to Purchase Sustainable Food: Generation Z’s Perspective. Sustainability, 16(17), 7284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177284

Kalro, H., & Joshipura, M. (2023). Product attributes and benefits: integrated framework and research agenda. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-09-2022-0402

Kamran, M., Pitafi, Z. R., Awan, T. M., Ochinowski, T., & Szostak, M. (2024). From Clicks to Trust: Electronic Word of Mouth and Perceived Website Quality Versus E-Shopping Attitudes. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 60(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2024-0016

Kim, D.-E., Benavides-Espinoza, C., LaVetter, D., & Sung, J. (2016). Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 2016(2). https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.02046

Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology and Marketing, 25(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20204

Kim, Y. A., & Srivastava, J. (2007). Impact of social influence in e-commerce decision making. 293. https://doi.org/10.1145/1282100.1282157

Komari, A. (2023). Product quality as a mediating variable in repurchase decisions: The case of Indonesian skincare products. Innovative Marketing, 19(3), 123. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.19(3).2023.11

Le, T. M., Vu, D. T., & Ly, N. T. H. (2025). Exploring the Interaction Between eWOM Information Characteristics and Purchase Intention on Tiktok. In Springer proceedings in business and economics (p. 1667). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4116-1_109

Madhavedi, S., Y, R. P., Hoo, W. C., Suhud, U., & Allan, M. (2025). Assessing the role of perceived quality and brand elements in shaping Indian consumers’ purchase intentions for cosmetic skincare products. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(1), 2634. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.5037

Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya‐Sánchez, R., & Liébana‐Cabanillas, F. (2021). Social commerce website design, perceived value and loyalty behavior intentions: The moderating roles of gender, age and frequency of use. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102404

Monika, Kapoor, D., & Gupta, P. (2023). An Assessment of Factors Influencing University Students’ Intentions to Purchase Luxury Skincare Products. ICST Transactions on E-Education and e-Learning, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.4108/eetel.v8i3.3214

Mustika, D. V., & Wahyudi, L. (2022). Does the Quality of Beauty E-commerce Impact Online Purchase Intention? The Role of Perceived Enjoyment and Perceived Trust. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research, 6(4), 199. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2022.6415

Nyrhinen, J., Sirola, A., Koskelainen, T., Munnukka, J., & Wilska, T. (2023). Online antecedents for young consumers’ impulse buying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 108129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108129

Pan, M., Blut, M., Ghiassaleh, A., & Lee, Z. W. Y. (2024). Influencer marketing effectiveness: A meta-analytic review [Review of Influencer marketing effectiveness: A meta-analytic review]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(1), 52. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01052-7

Riswanto, A. L., Ha, S., Lee, S.-H., & Kwon, M. (2024). Online Reviews Meet Visual Attention: A Study on Consumer Patterns in Advertising, Analyzing Customer Satisfaction, Visual Engagement, and Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 3102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19040150

Shan, W., Wang, J., Shi, X., & Evans, R. (2023). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth on patients’ choices in online health communities: A cross-media perspective. Journal of Business Research, 173, 114404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114404

Tehrani, R., & Ramezanian, H. (2024). Analyzing Influences on Consumer Attitudes Toward E-Commerce. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ut75a

Tiwari, A. K., & Kumari, N. (2024). The Impact of Visual Appeal, Perceived Price, and Trust on Consumer Buying Intention Toward Cosmetic Products: an Analysis Using Structural Equation Modelling. In Advances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (p. 456). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-612-3_30

Wang, X.-Y. (2024). Digital Marketing Strategies and Consumer Engagement: Unveiling TikToks E-Commerce Dynamics. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 103(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/103/20242445

Who made purchases through TikTok Shop during March-May. (2025).

Xie, J., Li, M., Du, R., & Townsend, D. W. (2025). The Impact of Generative AI Models on Consumer Purchase Behavior in E-Commerce Platforms: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. In Lecture notes in business information processing (p. 224). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94184-9_19

Xue, Y., Feng, T., & Chong, W. (2024). How technical and situational cues affect impulse buying behavior in social commerce? Evidence from bored consumers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1405189

Downloads

Published

2025-11-27

How to Cite

Justitia, A. R., Sutono, S., & Handoyo, A. S. H. (2025). The Influence of Site Visuals, Website Quality, and Perceived Product Benefits on Gen Z’s Purchase Decisions on TikTok. Global Insights in Management and Economic Research, 1(04), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.53905/Gimer.v1i04.28

Similar Articles

1-10 of 24

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.