Improving Numeracy Skills in Children Aged 4-5 Years Through Dough Play Activities: A Classroom Action Research

Authors

  • Nisrina Farida Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53905/edu.v1i01.04

Keywords:

numeracy skills, dough play, early childhood education, play-based learning, classroom action research, number concept, manipulative learning

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Numeracy is a foundational cognitive skill for young children that underpins subsequent academic achievement. However, conventional rote-based instruction methods have proven ineffective in fostering genuine number sense in early childhood settings. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether dough play activities could improve the numeracy skills of 4–5-year-old children at TK Al-Muhadjirin 2, East Bekasi, Indonesia.

Materials and methods: A Classroom Action Research (CAR) design was employed across two cycles (10 sessions total), involving 12 children aged 4–5 years. Numeracy performance was assessed using structured observation instruments covering number concept, number symbol recognition, number sequencing, number matching, number-to-object correspondence, and numeral writing. Data were analyzed using percentage calculations and qualitative thematic analysis.

Results: Mean numeracy scores improved from 54% (pre-intervention) to 74% at end of Cycle I, and to 82% at end of Cycle II, exceeding the predetermined success threshold of 71%. All 12 participants demonstrated measurable improvement across all assessed numeracy indicators.

Conclusions: Dough play activities constitute a developmentally appropriate, multisensory pedagogical intervention that significantly enhances numeracy competence in early childhood. The tactile-kinesthetic engagement afforded by dough manipulation supports concrete understanding of number concepts, facilitating the transition from enactive to symbolic mathematical reasoning.

References

Aunio, P., & Räsänen, P. (2016). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years – a working model for educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(5), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.996424

Baroody, A. J., Lai, M., & Mix, K. S. (2006). The development of young children's early number and operation sense and its implications for early childhood education. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (2nd ed., pp. 187–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380040901

Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2021). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(4), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203520574

Direktorat Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. (2014). Norma, standar, prosedur, dan kriteria pedoman sarana pendidikan anak usia dini [Norms, standards, procedures, and criteria for early childhood education equipment guidelines]. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428

Ellis, A. K. (2001). Teaching, learning and assessment together: The reflective classroom. Eye On Education.

Feldman, R. S. (2004). Child development (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Harvard University Press.

Jannah, R. (2011). Membuat anak cinta matematika dan eksak lainnya [Making children love mathematics and other exact sciences]. Diva Press.

Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.

Lee, K., & Richards, L. M. (2013). The homegrown preschooler: Teaching your kids in the places they live. Gryphon House.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2005). Playdough: What's standard? Young Children, 60(2), 12–13.

Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2009 tentang Standar Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini [Indonesian Minister of National Education Regulation No. 58 of 2009 on Early Childhood Education Standards]. (2009). Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Swartz, M. I. (2005). Playdough: What's standard? Young Children, 60(2), 12–13. National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Wildayenti. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berhitung anak melalui permainan kartu angka di Taman Kanak-kanak Ananda Pariaman [Improving children's numeracy through number card games at Ananda Pariaman Kindergarten]. Pesona PAUD, 1(1), 1–11

Downloads

Published

2026-01-18

How to Cite

Farida, N. (2026). Improving Numeracy Skills in Children Aged 4-5 Years Through Dough Play Activities: A Classroom Action Research. IGI in Education Insight, 1(01), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.53905/edu.v1i01.04