Strengthening Copyright Protection Through Ethical Design Practices in the Creative Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53905/Gimer.v2i01.02Keywords:
design ethics, copyright, creative media industry, visual plagiarism, platform governance, licensingAbstract
Purpose of the study: This study examines the role of design ethics as a preventive mechanism to reduce copyright infringement in creative media industries, while mapping common infringement patterns and relevant mitigation strategies in the digital transformation era.
Materials and methods: Using a qualitative-descriptive approach, this study conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed publications from 2021-2025, supplemented by conceptual-normative analysis of the relationship between professional ethics, platform governance, and content production behavior. Data sources included academic databases (Scopus, Web of Science), institutional reports (UNESCO, WIPO), and legal studies on intellectual property rights.
Results: Findings indicate that design ethics operates at three interconnected levels: (1) individual level—encompassing creative integrity, licensing literacy, and attribution practices; (2) organizational level—comprising asset-use standard operating procedures, copyright audits, and compliance culture; and (3) ecosystem level—involving ethics education, platform transparency, and policies protecting creators. The study proposes an "Ethics-Compliance-Rights" framework that integrates design ethics principles with moral and economic rights compliance and content-production governance.
Conclusions: Copyright infringement in creative media industries stems not only from legal ignorance but also from rapid production pressures, trend culture, misconceptions about free assets, and unclear platform governance. Effective prevention requires operationalizing design ethics through standard operating procedures, licensing documentation, regular training, visual plagiarism evaluation frameworks, and platform transparency. The proposed framework provides a comprehensive approach to reducing infringement risks while sustaining originality and quality in creative work.
References
Cui, S., Liu, F., Guo, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). Plagiarism or reference? Exploring the detection criteria and solutions of visual design plagiarism. In D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba, & P. Lloyd (Eds.), DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June–3 July, Bilbao, Spain. Design Research Society. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.776
Dergacheva, D., & Katzenbach, C. (2023). “We Learn Through Mistakes”: Perspectives of Social Media Creators on Copyright Moderation in the European Union. Social Media + Society, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231220329
Disemadi, H. S., & Romadona, H. G. (2021). A legal study of copyright laws regarding the use of free graphic designs in commercial products in Indonesia. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 4(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.26877/meta-yuridis.v4i2.7889
Dobrick, F. M., Fischer, J., & Hagen, L. M. (2017). Research Ethics in the Digital Age. In Springer eBooks. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5
Fiesler, C., Feuston, J. L., & Bruckman, A. (2015). Understanding Copyright Law in Online Creative Communities. 116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675234
Galea, M. (2024). Inspiration or infringement? Social media ‘viral’ trends: a case study on TikTok. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19(6), 541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae038
Goold, P. R. (2021). Moral Reflections on Strict Liability in Copyright. The Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v44i2.7821
Hacohen, U., Haviv, A., Sarfaty, S., Friedman, B., Elkin-Koren, N., Livni, R., & Bermano, A. H. (2024). Not All Similarities Are Created Equal: Leveraging Data-Driven Biases to Inform GenAI Copyright Disputes. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.17691
Hu, S., Wang, P., Yao, Y., & Lu, Z. (2024). “I Always Felt that Something Was Wrong.”: Understanding Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies when Professionals Use Large Language Models. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2411.04576
Khan, A. U. (2009). Bioinformation, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.6026/004.001
Lakshmanan, K., Peter, A. P., Mohandass, S., Varadharaj, S., Uma, L., & Prabaharan, D. (2015). Bioinformation, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6026/011.09
Lodra, I. N., & Mariasa, I. N. (2018). Plagiarism: A Threat To The Creative Industry Of Handmade Regional Batik Motifs In Indonesia. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 33(3), 310. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v33i3.517
Luo, H., & Mortimer, J. H. (2016). Copyright Enforcement: Evidence from Two Field Experiments. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(2), 499. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12182
Mayworm, S., DeVito, M. A., Delmonaco, D., Thach, H., & Haimson, O. L. (2023). Content Moderation Folk Theories and Perceptions of Platform Spirit among Marginalized Social Media Users. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/3632741
Nasir, M., Hasibuan, L., & Rosadi, K. I. (2021). 1502-Article Text-5249-1-10-20211021.pdf. Syntax Idea, 3(10), 2186. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v3i10.1503
Nasution, E. R., & Judijanto, L. (2024). Legal Strategies for Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in Business A Case Study Creative Industry in Indonesia. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 2(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v2i02.209
Palfrey, J., Gasser, U., Simun, M., & Barnes, R. F. (2009). Youth, Creativity, and Copyright in the Digital Age. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm.2009.0022
Permatasari, J. E., & Santoso, B. (2025). Juridical Review of the Piracy of Local Fashion Designs by Foreign Marketplaces: A Case Study of Hand-Drawn Batik and Tenun Designs on Shopee and Alibaba (2023–2024). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i8-104
Re|shaping policies for creativity: addressing culture as a global public good. (2022). https://doi.org/10.58337/oiln3726
Šarčević, T., Karlowicz, A., Mayer, R., Baeza‐Yates, R., & Rauber, A. (2024). U Can’t Gen This? A Survey of Intellectual Property Protection Methods for Data in Generative AI. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.15386
Suhaeruddin, U. (2024). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Era Digital: Tantangan Hukum Dan Etika Dalam Perlindungan Karya Kreatif Dan Inovas. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(3), 122. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v3i3.888
Temara, S. (2025). Ethics For Responsible Data Research: Integrating Cybersecurity Perspectives In Digital Era. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5045045
Todorova, T., Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Doğan, G., Saunders, L., Horvat, A., Terra, A. L., Landøy, A., Repanovici, A., Morrison, C., Vanderkast, E. J. S., Secker, J., Rudžionienė, J., Kortelainen, T., & Koltay, T. (2017). Information professionals and copyright literacy: a multinational study. Library Management, 0. https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-01-2017-0007
Torkestani, M. S., & Mansouri, T. (2025). SCOR: A Framework for Responsible AI Innovation in Digital Ecosystems. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2509.10653
UNESCO. (2022). Re|Shaping policies for creativity: Addressing culture as a global public good (Global Report 2022). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380474
World Intellectual Property Organization. (n.d.). Copyright in the digital environment. WIPO. Retrieved January 15, 2026, from https://www.wipo.int/en/web/copyright/activities/digital
Zahwa, S. C. S., & Romadhona, M. (2022). Analysis of the plagiarism case of Facebook Inc's Meta logo with the M-Sense Migraine logo, a digital health company. In Proceedings of SNADES 2022: Interdisciplinary Collaborative Design in the Digital Age (pp. 268–275). https://doi.org/10.35912/snades.v1i1.1234
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliyah, Widya Oktary Setiawardhani, Zulfah Hasanah, Arief Sulistiyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
