Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Impacts and Ethical Challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53905/ChildDev.v2i01.09

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, early childhood education, systematic literature review, pedagogical impact, ethical challenges, adaptive learning, educational robots

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This systematic literature review investigates the pedagogical impacts and ethical challenges associated with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in Early Childhood Education (ECE) settings globally. The study aims to synthesize empirical evidence on AI-mediated learning outcomes, teacher-AI interaction dynamics, and the ethical dimensions of deploying intelligent systems with young children aged 0–8 years.

Materials and methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive electronic search was conducted across seven major academic databases — Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar — covering publications from January 2015 to December 2024. After rigorous screening against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, 63 peer-reviewed studies were retained for full analysis. Data were extracted using a standardized protocol and synthesized through thematic analysis combined with narrative synthesis.

Results: The review identified five principal thematic clusters: (1) AI-enhanced personalized learning and adaptive instruction (n=18); (2) social-emotional development mediated by AI companions and robots (n=14); (3) language and literacy acquisition supported by conversational AI (n=13); (4) teacher professional development and pedagogical transformation (n=10); and (5) ethical, privacy, and algorithmic bias concerns (n=8). Findings indicate statistically significant improvements in phonological awareness, early numeracy, and engagement metrics across diverse cultural contexts. Concurrently, substantive concerns regarding data privacy, digital equity, and the risk of replacing human pedagogical relationships emerged consistently.

Conclusions: AI technologies hold transformative potential for ECE when deployed under rigorous ethical frameworks that prioritize child welfare, developmental appropriateness, and equitable access. However, current evidence underscores significant research gaps regarding longitudinal outcomes, cultural transferability, and robust governance frameworks. Policy-makers, educators, and technology designers are urged to adopt co-design principles that centre the developmental rights of young children.

References

Alam, A. (2022). Investigating Sustainable Education and Positive Psychology Interventions in Schools Towards Achievement of Sustainable Happiness and Wellbeing for 21st Century Pedagogy and Curriculum. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 19481. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.19481ecst

Alemi, M., Ghanbarzadeh, A., Meghdari, A., & Moghadam, L. J. (2021). Clinical application of a humanoid robot in pediatric cancer interventions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 13(4), 605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-020-00668-z

Angwaomaodoko, E. A. (2024). The Re-examination of the Dangers and Implications of Artificial Intelligence for the Future of Scholarship and Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4848051

Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & Luo, W. (2025). Innovating responsibly: ethical considerations for AI in early childhood education. AI Brain and Child, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-025-00003-5

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S., Ellis, S., Hartmann‐Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510

Chowsomchat, J., Boonrusmee, S., & Thongseiratch, T. (2023). Swipe, tap, read? Unveiling the effects of Touchscreen devices on Emergent Literacy Development in preschoolers. BMC Pediatrics, 23(1), 625. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04450-y

Ciccone, M. (2023). Algorithmic Rights and Protections for Children. In The MIT Press eBooks. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13654.001.0001

Connery, A. K., Raghunathan, R. S., Colbert, A. M., Erdődi, L. A., Warschausky, S., Huth‐Bocks, A., Taylor, H. G., Raghunathan, T. E., Berglund, P. A., Staples, A. D., Lukomski, A., Kirkland, J., Cano, J., & Lajiness-O’Neill, R. (2023). The influence of sociodemographic factors and response style on caregiver report of infant developmental status. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10, 1080163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1080163

Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Jordan, K. (2020). The use of artificial intelligence in education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(4), 529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2101255

Daniolou, S., Pandis, N., & Znoj, H. (2022). The Efficacy of Early Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(17), 5100. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175100

Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2019). Exploring Data Justice: Conceptions, Applications and Directions. Information Communication & Society, 22(7), 873. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1606268

Education, I. C. on the F. of. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO eBooks. https://doi.org/10.54675/asrb4722

Fernández-Reyes, A. L., & López, J. M. (2021). Conversational AI for Spanish-English bilingual phonological awareness in preschool settings: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 172, 104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104251

Gomes, C. A., Costa, P. H., & Oliveira, F. R. (2023). Digital equity and artificial intelligence in Brazilian early childhood education: A critical case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 97, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102714

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence In Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. In Open Research Online (The Open University). The Open University.

Imohimi, E. O. (2025). Building Privacy and Preserving AI Models for Secure Student Data Management in Educational Technology Platforms. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 17(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2025.173011

Kazu, İ. Y., & İş, A. (2018). An Investigation About Actualization Levels of Learning Outcomes in Early Childhood Curriculum. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 66. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2928

Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2022). Exploring early childhood teachers’ perceptions of AI in Korean classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(3), 521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01333-z

Kory-Westlund, J. M. (2023). Implications of children’s social, emotional, and relational interactions with robots for human–robot empathy. In Routledge eBooks (p. 256). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189978-17

Lademann, J., Henze, J., Honke, N., Wollny, C., & Becker-Genschow, S. (2025). Teacher training in the age of AI: Impact on AI Literacy and Teachers’ Attitudes. ArXiv.Org. http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03011

Lee, S., & Eronen, J. (2025). Transforming English education in Japan by utilizing large language models for tailored learning and diverse skill development. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00856-1

Li, S., Zeng, C., Liu, H., Jia, J., Liang, M., Cha, Y., Lim, C. P., & Wu, X. (2025). A meta-analysis of AI-enabled personalized STEM education in schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00566-y

Liu, X., Xing, Y., Chen, Y. E., Pei, W., Choi, J. J., & Xu, Y. (2025). Children’s Narrative Participation in Story Co-Creation with AI vs. Human Partners: Response Styles and Narrative Features. 803. https://doi.org/10.1145/3713043.3731486

Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861

McCormick, B., Caulfield, L. E., Richard, S. A., Pendergast, L., Seidman, J. C., Maphula, A., Koshy, B., Blacy, L., Roshan, R., Nahar, B., Shrestha, R., Rasheed, M. A., Svensen, E., Rasmussen, Z., Scharf, R. J., Haque, S., Oriá, R. B., Murray‐Kolb, L. E., & INVESTIGATORS, M.-E. N. (2020). Early Life Experiences and Trajectories of Cognitive Development. PEDIATRICS, 146(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-3660

Memari, M., & Ruggles, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Elementary STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Challenges [Review of Artificial Intelligence in Elementary STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Challenges]. arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2511.00105

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo‐Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Park, S., & Kim, H. (2023). Longitudinal impacts of AI robot companions on social-emotional development in Korean preschoolers. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101728

Peng, Z., Wang, C., & Lin, L. (2022). A meta-analysis of AI-personalized learning effects in K-2 educational settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 96, 102147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102147

Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3

Robinson, D. B., & Young, D. C. (2020). The Relationship Between Teachers’ Inclusion-Related Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes and Student Outcomes: A Review of Recent Literature. Exceptionality Education International, 29(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v29i2.9400

Sevilla, A., Ruiz, P. C., Rello, L., & Sanz, I. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Computer-Assisted Learning and AI-guided Tutors. Italian Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-025-00354-1

Shonkoff, J. P. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods. National Academies Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17226/9824

Struensee, S. von. (2021). The Role of Social Movements, Coalitions, and Workers in Resisting Harmful Artificial Intelligence and Contributing to the Development of Responsible AI. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880779

UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General Comment No. 25 on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2021-childrens-rights-relation

Wright, D. B. (2019). Research Methods for Education With Technology: Four Concerns, Examples, and Recommendations. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00147

Yamada, T., Miura, Y., Oi, M., Akatsuka, N., Tanaka, K., Tsukidate, N., Yamamoto, T., Okuno, H., Nakanishi, M., Taniike, M., Mohri, I., & Laugeson, E. A. (2019). Examining the Treatment Efficacy of PEERS in Japan: Improving Social Skills Among Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(3), 976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04325-1

Yang, D., Xia, C., Collins, P., & Warschauer, M. (2022). The role of bilingual discussion prompts in shared E-book reading. Computers & Education, 190, 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104622

Yi, H., Liu, T., & Lan, G. (2024). The key artificial intelligence technologies in early childhood education: a review [Review of The key artificial intelligence technologies in early childhood education: a review]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(1). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10637-7

Zawacki‐Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

How to Cite

Rocha, K., Dudley, D., & Seymour, L. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Impacts and Ethical Challenges. Journal of Foundational Learning and Child Development, 2(01), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.53905/ChildDev.v2i01.09

Similar Articles

11-20 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.